![]() ![]() So it's not even theoretically an option but I thank you for the suggestion I'd just rather tell users "your pretty labels might disappear tomorrow, move your messages to folders instead" than move this amount of data around just to test. Yeah, but some ppl on this forum do know if UID handling has been updated or not without me needing to move a complete server. ![]() Yes that sounds like a pretty killer server hardware-wise but some things will bring down even a powerful server, running a command-line AV scanner as 1000's of emails come in at once or perhaps doing massive complicated SQL queries concurrently to help speed up email clients on 1000's & 1000's of messages even if just a few clients. Besides you can easily enable it again if you like, which has good side-effect of rebuilding the meta data cache database which I suggested as well so it's a 2-fer! Indexing might speed up the client (guess that's the point of it) but it is at the expense of the server & you're complaining about the server being overload so common sense says try disabling that feature to see if the problem stops then you know the try cost of using it. One possibility is upgrading to latest but you are shy about doing that so I suggested trying on a different box. It sure might be possible that the number of files opened/closed in that time frame might correspond to half a day's heavy hammering by the "new" TB re-enabling of offline messages.ĭon't recall callin ya a n00b but sometimes it helps to think outside the box to track issues down. ![]() I have seen the same thing maaany times before on this system (hMS hanging completely, not answering TCP connections) but then it happened once a month or every two weeks. Watching the system with Process Explorer and Process Monitor simultaneously it sure looks like memory consumption is directly related to the amount of message files opened/closed (which in turn corresponds to a connection so it's hard to tell which is which). No, I'm not talking about subscribed folders, I am talking about Thunderbird's "offline messages" feature.ĥ0 users, 700000(-ish) messages, hMS caching is on Disabling it in new TB seems to solve the problem but it's too soon to tell for sure. I disabled the feature in old TB, but new TB is much more aggressive on caching messages to get better search capabilities. The other day it managed to create a 2GB log file for one day and I'm not keen on trawling THAT. Well when the process hangs it filled up with lots of weird dropped connections and the like. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |